Saving...
Over the last few days there has been some discussion over a photo of Demi Moore in the “W” magazine. It seems that some people have maintained that there is a chunk of her hips missing in the photo due to photoshop editing.
Demi Moore, in an apparent huff, has released the original picture to prove that the accusations aren’t true, and all kinds of people have been adding their comments to the story. For instance “promi blogger” Perez Hilton added his remarks to the effect that even if her hips hadn’t been retouched, the rest of her certainly had.
But honestly, who cares anyway? I certainly don’t. Pictures of Demi Moore will be the closest I will ever get to her anyway, so what does it matter whether the Goddess is flawed or not?
LOOK AT OPRAH — in her dreams she looks like her magazine covers
as it probably is with all covers…
take a bit of arm thickness out.. legs that don’t photograph correctly
the perfect skin, well beyond makeup…
those are works of editing.. not reality
i’ve used several cover pics over the years on RIP Renfield
CHALLENGING THE READER
TO GUESS WHO IT IS ? (from photoshop editing)
Let alone IF it’s been retouched…
and as far as Demi ? who cares ?
no matter how she looks now… her day is gone…
age is a bitch